The congressional committee tasked with investigating the January 6 Capitol Riots is closing in on top Trump ally and adviser Steve Bannon with an expected vote to recommend criminal contempt charges against the former White House aide for defying a subpoena.
Adam Schiff, the House Intelligence Committee chairman who also sits on the January 6 committee, went as far as to say that he expects the Justice Department to prosecute.
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff , who also sits on the January 6 panel, said he expects the Justice Department to prosecute the cases.
“The last four years have given people like Steve Bannon the impression they’re above the law,” Schiff said during an interview for C-SPAN’s Book TV that airs next weekend. “But they’re going to find out otherwise.”
For more reporting from The Associated Press, see below:
The chairman of the special committee, Representative Bennie Thompson, a Mississippi Democrat, said the panel will vote Tuesday to recommend charges against Bannon, an adviser to Donald Trump for years who was in touch with the president ahead of the most serious assault on Congress in two centuries.
“The Select Committee will not tolerate defiance of our subpoenas,” Thompson said in a statement Thursday. Bannon, he said, is “hiding behind the former president’s insufficient, blanket and vague statements regarding privileges he has purported to invoke. We reject his position entirely.”
If approved by the Democratic-majority committee, the recommendation of criminal charges would go to the full House. Approval there would send them to the Justice Department, which has final say on prosecution.
The showdown with Bannon is just one facet of a broad and escalating congressional inquiry, with 19 subpoenas issued so far and thousands of pages of documents flowing to the committee and its staff. Challenging Bannon’s defiance is a crucial step for the panel, whose members are vowing to restore the force of congressional subpoenas after they were routinely flouted during Trump’s time in office.
The committee had scheduled a Thursday deposition with Bannon, but his lawyer said Trump had directed him not to produce any information protected by executive privileges afforded to a president, and that Bannon wouldn’t comply “until these issues are resolved.” Bannon, who was not a White House staffer on January 6, also failed to provide documents to the panel by a deadline last week.
Still, the committee could end up stymied again after years of Trump administration officials refusing to cooperate with Congress. The longtime Trump adviser similarly defied a subpoena during a GOP-led investigation into Trump’s Russia ties in 2018, but the House did not hold him into contempt.
Even though President Joe Biden has been supportive of the committee’s work, it is uncertain whether the Justice Department would choose to prosecute the criminal contempt charges against Bannon or any other witnesses who might defy the panel. Even if it the department does prosecute, the process could take months, if not years. And such contempt cases are notoriously difficult to win.
Members of the committee are pressuring the department to take their side.
Schiff said efforts to hold Bannon and others in contempt during the Russia investigation were blocked by Republicans and the Trump Justice Department.
“But now we have Merrick Garland , we have an independent Justice Department, we have an attorney general who believes in the rule of law—and so this is why I have confidence that we will get the answers,” Schiff said.
While Bannon has outright defied the January 6 committee, other Trump aides who have been subpoenaed appear to be negotiating. A deposition by a second witness that had been scheduled for Thursday, former Defense Department official Kashyap Patel, was delayed, but Patel is still engaging with the panel, a committee aide said. The aide requested anonymity to discuss the confidential talks.
Two other men who worked for Trump—former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows and longtime Trump social media director Dan Scavino—were scheduled for depositions Friday, but they have both been pushed back as well. Meadows, like Patel, has been given a “short postponement” as he is also engaging with the panel, the aide said, and Scavino’s deposition has been rescheduled because there were delays in serving his subpoena.
It is unclear to what extent Trump has tried to influence his aides, beyond his lawyers’ attempts to assert executive privilege. In a statement Thursday, the former president said the members of the committee should “hold themselves in criminal contempt” and that “the people are not going to stand for it!”
Other witnesses are cooperating, including some who organized or staffed the Trump rally on the Ellipse behind the White House that preceded the riot. The committee subpoenaed 11 rally organizers and gave them a Wednesday deadline to turn over documents and records. They have also been asked to appear at scheduled depositions.
Among those complying was Lyndon Brentnall, whose firm was hired to provide event security at the Ellipse, a park near the White House, that day and two longtime Trump campaign and White House staffers, Megan Powers and Hannah Salem. It is uncertain whether any of the others subpoenaed have complied.
Women for America First, the group that organized the rally on the Ellipse, posted on a fundraising site that two of its founders would “happily testify before an open session of Congress so that the whole world can hear the truth.”
The group did not say whether Amy and Kylie Kremer, who are mother and daughter, have complied with the subpoenas or plan to appear for depositions, but noted that “we must turn over the thousands of documents on October 13 and are scheduled to appear in Congress on October 29.”
Many of the rioters who stormed the Capitol on January 6 marched up the National Mall after attending at least part of Trump’s rally, where he repeated his meritless claims of election fraud and implored the crowd to “fight like hell.” Dozens of police officers were injured as the Trump supporters overwhelmed them and broke through windows and doors to interrupt the certification of Biden’s victory.
The rioters repeated Trump’s false claims of widespread fraud as they marched through the Capitol, even though the results of the election were confirmed by state officials, upheld by courts and even rejected by Trump’s own attorney general.
The panel has also issued a subpoena to a former Justice Department lawyer, Jeffrey Clark, who positioned himself as Trump’s ally and aided the Republican president’s efforts to challenge the results of the 2020 election.
A Senate committee report issued last week showed that Clark championed Trump’s efforts to undo the election results and clashed as a result with department superiors who resisted the pressure, culminating in a dramatic White House meeting at which Trump ruminated about elevating Clark to attorney general.
- Schiff Vows to Release Transcripts of Impeachment Inquiry Testimony, Won’t Say When
- Rudy Giuliani splits from his own attorney after just two weeks as he says he will defy subpoena from Democrats' subpoena saying: 'If they enforce it, then we will see what happens'
- Did God Make Only Adam and Eve - An Insight Into the Legal Position of Eunuchs
- Law of Attraction Manifestation Exercise #21 - Watching For the Signs From Universe
- After Hillary, Voting With Conscience and Pride
- Judges, Justice, and a Gulf in Between
- We Will Never Learn
- Brexit deal is 'within sight' as talks stretch into the night but Boris Johnson is warned one bad move could 'turn it to dust'
- High Fructose Corn Syrup - Big Business and the Little Man
- The Pope and the "Holy War"
- Who Else Is America First?
- Just a Few Questions
- The Taxman is Coming This November!
- How a United States President Really Gets Elected
- How To Manage A Layoff
- Open the Door to Intimacy and Power - Knowing God's Covenant Names
- Keys That Will Change the Destiny of Your Family
- Powerless - Are You Deceiving Yourself?
- The Souls of White Folk
- A Fond Farewell
Adam Schiff says 'people like Steve Bannon' are not "above the law" ahead of contempt vote have 1320 words, post on www.newsweek.com at October 15, 2021. This is cached page on Europe Breaking News. If you want remove this page, please contact us.