A federal appeals court ruled on Friday that House Democrats can proceed with a lawsuit over President TrumpDonald John TrumpBiden says his faith is ‘bedrock foundation of my life’ after Trump claim Coronavirus talks on life support as parties dig in, pass blame Ohio governor tests negative in second coronavirus test MORE’s diversion of $2.5 billion in Pentagon funding to build a U.S.-Mexico border wall.
In a 7-2 decision, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that lawmakers have the legal right to sue the administration over a financing maneuver that a separate California-based federal appeals court found to be an illegal encroachment of Congress’s power of the purse.
The Friday ruling was seen as an endorsement of Congress’s right to pursue legal action to enforce its authority over federal appropriations. But it is unclear what practical effect it would have if Democrats ultimately prevail in their lawsuit.
The Supreme Court has allowed the Trump administration to continue using the defense funds amid ongoing litigation, despite the California-based court’s ruling that the scheme is unconstitutional.
Disputes over Trump’s financing tactic arose early last year after he declared a national emergency at the southern border in an effort to free up additional funding for his signature project. Trump’s move came after a congressional spending bill allocated some $1.3 billion for border security, which fell far short of the nearly $5 billion Trump said was needed to complete the border wall.
Trump then reallocated $2.5 billion in funding that Congress appropriated for defense and military uses, which sparked multiple lawsuits.
A federal district court in California last year temporarily halted the use of the reappropriated funds. But the Supreme Court in July 2019 stayed that order, allowing the administration to use defense funds for the construction project while the appeals process plays out.
On appeal, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in California last month ruled against Trump’s financing maneuver. A divided three-judge panel found that the administration had violated the Appropriations Clause of the Constitution, which gives Congress the exclusive power of the purse.
But the Supreme Court in a 5-4 ruling last week declined to let the 9th Circuit’s decision take effect.
Justice Stephen BreyerStephen BreyerSupreme Court declines to halt Trump border wall Supreme Court clears way for second federal execution Supreme Court lifts stay for second federal execution this week MORE, writing in dissent on behalf of the court’s four-member liberal wing, said he feared the majority’s ruling “may operate, in effect, as a final judgment.”
Meanwhile, the related challenge initiated by House Democrats last year followed a different trajectory through the federal courts in D.C. That case had been focused on a more preliminary question concerning the separation of powers, which the D.C. Circuit’s Friday decision resolved by ruling that Democrats could pursue legal action against the administration.
- Trump's Border Wall Moves One Step Closer to Construction
- What I learned from a week at the Mexico border wall
- Trump Demands Border Wall, Immigration Crackdown in Exchange For DACA Deal
- America's Worst Congressman Has a Disgusting Plan to Pay for Trump's Border Wall
- The White House Could Shut the Government Down if It Doesn't Get Money for Trump's Border Wall
- GoFundMe Campaign Raises Millions for Trump's Border Wall
- Trump Backs Off Threat to Shut Down Government Over Border Wall Funding
- Here's the insane amount of money a tiny fraction of Trump's border wall is going to cost
- Workers Begin Removal of President Trump's Border Wall Prototypes
- This anti-immigrant sheriff wants his prisoners to help build Trump's border wall
- No, an eco-friendly design will not make Trump's border wall any less awful
- Veteran draws millions in donations for Trump’s border wall
- Meet Some of the Terrible Companies Clamoring to Build Trump's Border Wall
- California Sues Trump's Administration Over the Border Wall
- Judge Who Was the Target of Trump's Racist Attacks to Hear a Major Case on the Border Wall
- US Says Border Wall Will 'Avoid' Historic Texas Cemetery
- Life Comes at You Fast: Trump Voters Mad That Border Wall Would Put Their Homes on Mexican Side
- The Senate Is Now Standing Between Trump and His Border Wall
- Trump: 2,000-4,000 troops needed for Mexico border security
- Trump To Waste Everyone's Time by Touring a Bunch of Stupid Border Wall Prototypes
House Democrats can sue Trump over U.S.-Mexico border wall funding, court rules have 714 words, post on thehill.com at August 7, 2020. This is cached page on Europe Breaking News. If you want remove this page, please contact us.