So long, politics? As George W. Bush mounted Operation Noble Eagle, Republicans and Democrats found little over which to disagree. In the days after the September 11 terror attack, the entire House and Senate–with the exception of one Congresswoman–approved a resolution of war that granted Bush wide latitude. (Congress declared war, but Bush will designate the enemy.) The Senate OK’d by voice vote the controversial nomination of John Negroponte to be UN ambassador. Congress passed $40 billion in emergency funds and ceded Bush great control over their disbursement. The Senate, with little deliberation, endorsed quickly prepared legislation to expand the government’s ability to wiretap suspected terrorists and to order the CIA to scuttle rules on the recruitment of informants with violent pasts. A $15 billion bailout of the airline industry nearly sailed through the House. Republican and Democratic Congressional leaders hailed the sublimation of partisan differences. House majority whip Tom DeLay even jettisoned his opposition to paying back dues to the United Nations.
Who can say how long comity will last? The Democrats’ agenda has vanished as the party tries to work out the dilemmas of being in opposition during a time of declared (if not actual) war. “We’re confused, as you might imagine,” says a liberal House Democrat. “My fear is that most members will give Bush everything he wants and try to adjourn as quickly as possible, not have any tough votes, no debates that might get them into trouble. Every Democratic issue is down the drain.” For instance, Representative Marty Meehan, a Massachusetts Democrat, suspended his almost-successful attempt at forcing Republican House leaders to bring his campaign finance reform bill up for a vote. “All efforts are on helping New York City and the Pentagon rebuild,” a Meehan aide explains. House and Senate Democrats shelved provisions that imposed limits on national missile defense funding. “No one wants to look partisan now,” says a Democratic Senate aide. “You can argue SDI money is better spent elsewhere, but no Democrat wants to give Bush and the Republicans the opportunity of pointing a finger and saying, ‘There they go.’”
It was Bush, not a Democrat, who publicly noted that Washington must remember that a domestic agenda remains. “Sure,” says a Democratic Congressional aide, “education and a patients’ bill of rights, on his terms now.” As members of Congress returned to Washington, Democrats were hoping the Republicans would not move fast with a proposal for a capital gains tax cut. “If they push this forward under the cover of crisis, it will be very difficult to stop,” the aide remarks.
On the Democratic side, Representative Barney Frank has tried to initiate one crafty strategic thrust. The liberal Democrat drafted legislation to rescind the reduction in the top income tax rate that passed as part of Bush’s tax cut. That particular cut mainly benefits the top 1 percent, and Frank would devote the billions rescued to Social Security and Medicare. “This would let us spend $100 billion on reconstruction, airport security, military action, the economy, without tapping the Social Security surplus,” Frank says. “The Republicans promised not to touch Social Security; this would allow them to keep their promise.”
Frank’s colleagues applauded when he described the bill at a Democratic caucus meeting. But the GOPers will certainly seek to smother Frank’s legislation, and they have the means to do it. Credit Frank with attempting to provide the Democrats an active position of their own. The question is, Do enough of his colleagues want one? “Great idea,” says a House Democrat. “I just don’t know if we’re strong enough to do this.”
Another unknown is whether Democrats and Republicans will skirmish over the attack-related matters that will dominate Washington. A dramatic boost in Pentagon spending appears a certainty. Will there be disagreement over how much? (Some GOPers yearn for a 25 percent increase.) The Administration will be pressing assorted law enforcement and security initiatives. Senator Pat Leahy, who chairs the Judiciary Committee, has signaled that he’s not eager to rubber-stamp new measures with civil liberties consequences. And Senator Russ Feingold, who chairs a judiciary subcommittee, has declared he feels “a special duty to defend our Constitution against proposals, born of an understandable desire for vengeance and justice, that would undermine the constitutional liberties that make this country what it is.” Yet how much of a fight might arise? “The mood is basically to cave,” says Julian Epstein, the former minority staff director of the House Judiciary Committee. But Epstein believes a partisan clash could materialize if the Republicans get greedy and push for too much.
“This all will be very frustrating,” says a senior House Democratic aide. “Who knows how long a war on terrorism takes?” Noting disappointment with his leader, a Democratic Congressman remarks, “Dick Gephardt said there should be no light and no air between us and the President. But there have to be things worthy of debate. It’s not political bickering to deal with the economy and civil liberties. There are debates to be had–even if most people want to run out of town.”
- 'The Biggest Lie is That the Democrats are the Party of Non-Racism', Author Says
- Multiple House Democrats Ask Biden to Relinquish Sole Authority to Launch Nuclear Weapons
- The GOP's impeachment 'prisoner's dilemma'
- Centrist Democrats pose major problem for progressives
- The long and the short of India’s Naypyitaw dilemma
- A powerful tool to take on the Supreme Court — if Democrats use it right
- Democrats offer bills to boost IRS audits of rich, corporations
- Thwart US veto or await new president? WTO has leadership dilemma
- Democrats rush to Biden's defense on border surge
- Modi's Dilemma
- Daddy dilemma for scandal-scarred Andrew Cuomo and his three daughters
- Myanmar: Part 2 - The dilemma of the US, China and ASEAN
- Sanders says Biden sees progressives as 'strong part of his coalition'
- Senate leaders quash talk of rank-and-file COVID-19 deal
- It's time for Biden's Cuba
- Joe Biden's surgeon son-in-law Howard Krein is 'playing with fire' by advising healthcare start-ups through his company which touts its connection to the president
- 30 things you should know about Narendra Modi
- Senate confirms Biden's deputy Defense secretary
- What Britain in the EU means to us: five leading European writers on the threat of Brexit
- The Hill's Morning Report - Presented by TikTok - Senate trial of Trump to dominate this week
The Democrats’ Dilemma have 1043 words, post on www.thenation.com at September 20, 2001. This is cached page on Europe Breaking News. If you want remove this page, please contact us.