Former New York Times executive editor Jill Abramson fired back at allegations that she plagiarized passages in her new book, telling CNN on Sunday that her lifting of other writers’ words was not unethical because she credited them in the footnotes.
“I would never purposely take credit for the work of another journalist or writer,” Abramson told “Reliable Sources” host Brian Stelter while responding to ongoing criticism of her book, “Merchants of Truth.”
Abramson admitted that there were a few missing citations in her more than 70 pages of footnotes, which she feels “terrible” about, but that overall she believes she gave proper credit.
.@brianstelter to ex-NYT editor Jill Abramson: “It doesn’t matter if I put a footnote 300 pages later. If I do that in a book, that’s plagiarism. That’s word for word stealing other people’s work” https://t.co/kQyrCuLkjI pic.twitter.com/t8nBEeejeh
— Reliable Sources (@ReliableSources) February 10, 2019
Stelter argued that her method of lifting passages from other writers and not immediately crediting the source in the text is plagiarism.
“Even if I include a footnote, I still can’t steal their words, word for word the way that you did,” he said.
“Well if you give them proper credit you can,” she responded.
I’m saying that I made some errors in the way I credited sources but that there was no attempt to pass off someone else’s ideas, opinions and phrasings as my own.
“But footnotes are not sufficient. You have to say in the text that you’re taking the words from another source,” Stelter said, after adding that her view of appropriate citations does not match the editorial standards of either The New York Times or Harvard University, where Abramson is a lecturer.
“I’m saying that I made some errors in the way I credited sources but that there was no attempt to pass off someone else’s ideas, opinions and phrasings as my own. These were all factual passages that unfortunately did not match up exactly to the right footnotes but they are credited in the footnotes elsewhere,” she said.
Harvard’s guide on using sources approves the citation methods outlined by the Modern Language Association, the American Psychological Association and The Chicago Manual of Style, according to the university’s website.
Both APA style and MLA style require parenthetical citations in the text that indicate the source of a particular quote, paraphrased statement or idea, or fact. They also require a list of references at the end of the paper. Chicago style similarly requires footnotes and that quotations of five or more lines be indented as a separate block. An example can be seen here.
A Harvard representative did not immediately respond to a request for comment on its citation guide or Abramson’s comments.
- Jill Abramson: NYT Publisher Drafted Letter Apologizing to China for Damning Report
- Reporter alleges Jill Abramson lifted material for her book 'Merchants of Truth'
- Delingpole: ‘We Really Muffed’ It – Scientist Admits Error in Hyped Global Warming Study
- Disgraced Cardinal George Pell LOSES his appeal and will remain behind bars for sexually abusing two choirboys after two out of three justices rule a jury of his peers got it right - but plans to go to High Court
- Barstool Sports Blasts ‘Plagiarizing House of Lies’ BuzzFeed Over Copyright Complaints
- Trump again defiant after rare mea culpa on Russia
- ‘There’s Not a Chance in the World’: Chris Wallace Battles Jill Stein Over Recount Changing Results
- WaPo Issues Correction After DOJ Counters Claim of ‘Zero Tolerance’ Demise
- A New Quantum Paradox Flags Errors in Our View of Reality
- Journalism Isn't Dying. It's Returning to Its Roots
- Virginia voters — including African-Americans — have Northam's back
- Pete Seeger: “You should never give up!”
- The Real Fake News: Top Scientific Retractions of 2018
- Michelle Shocked: Amid a Meltdown, Jesus Is Her Crisis PR Consultant
- It Started as an Online Gaming Prank. Then It Turned Deadly
- US wins 4th World Cup title, 2nd in a row, beats Dutch 2-0
- How many groups reached the Americas before Christopher Columbus?
- SXSW Announces Midnight Movies and Final Titles Added to 2016 Lineup
- It Came From Inside the House: Community, Criticism and
- Newbie Recap: “Apocrypha”, “Pusher”, & “Teso Dos Bichos”
Jill Abramson Remains Defiant Over Plagiarism Claims, Admits 'Some Errors' have 760 words, post on www.huffingtonpost.com at February 10, 2019. This is cached page on Europe Breaking News. If you want remove this page, please contact us.