Scientists sometimes like to portray what they do as divorced from the everyday jealousies, rivalries and tribalism of human relationships. What makes science special is that data and results that can be replicated are what matters and the scientific truth will out in the end. But a close reading of the emails hacked from the University of East Anglia in November exposes the real process of everyday science in lurid detail. Many of the emails reveal strenuous efforts by the mainstream climate scientists to do what outside observers would regard as censoring their critics. And the correspondence raises awkward questions about the effectiveness of peer review – the supposed gold standard of scientific merit – and the operation of the UN’s top climate body, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The scientists involved disagree. They say they were engaged not in suppressing dissent but in upholding scientific standards by keeping bad science out of peer-reviewed journals. Either way, when passing judgment on papers that directly attack their own work, they were mired in conflicts of interest that would not be allowed in most professions. The cornerstone of maintaining the quality of scientific papers is the peer review system. Under… Read full this story
- Climate change email hacking to be looked into by University of East Anglia
- Climate change champion and sceptic both call for inquiry into leaked emails
- What happens if the U.S. withdraws from the Paris climate change agreement?
- Gordon Brown attacks 'flat-earth' climate change sceptics
- Third of Earth’s population could live in brutal ‘Sahara heat’ in just 50 YEARS due to climate change, study warns
- Climate change sceptic thinktank not 'influential' enough to reveal funder
- Climate change denier Nick Griffin to represent EU at Copenhagen
- EPA Prevents Scientists From Speaking About Climate Change at Conference
- Australia has found common ground to respond to Covid-19. We can do the same for climate change
- Oil Companies Admit Climate Change Is Real, Say Don’t Blame Us
Climate change emails between scientists reveal flaws in peer review have 319 words, post on www.theguardian.com at February 2, 2010. This is cached page on Europe Breaking News. If you want remove this page, please contact us.